Oddly enough, this spam seems to have been forwarded by a 3rd party
claiming to be spamcop.net rather than by the original spammer. Are
they testing the nettest page? Are they trying to get the original
spammer in trouble? Or are they simply clueless? Why did they send
four of them? We just don't know. The address it was submitted from,
66.81.145.51, seems to have no relation to either spamcop.net or
djenis.info.
ffhaneea04b08s05 decodes to:
66.81.145.51 2004-02-08 19:05
Return-path: cowtown@spamcop.net Sun Feb 8 23:38:04 2004 [2004-02-08 23:38:04 59254]
Received: from c60.cesmail.net (c60.cesmail.net [216.154.195.49])
by www.munged.ext (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i194c3f02017
for <nts-ffhaneea04b08s05@munged.ext>; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 23:38:03 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO delta.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.30)
by c60.cesmail.net with SMTP; 08 Feb 2004 19:25:00 -0500
Received: (qmail 6669 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2004 00:25:02 -0000
Received: from host-66-81-157-62.rev.o1.com (host-66-81-157-62.rev.o1.com
[66.81.157.62]) by webmail.spamcop.net (Horde) with HTTP for
<cowtown@spamcop.net@cesmail.net>; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:25:02 -0800
Message-ID: <20040208162502.4v0giyskscwc44wo@webmail.spamcop.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:25:02 -0800
From: cowtown@spamcop.net
To: "munged.ext" <nts-ffhaneea04b08s05@munged.ext>
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs
X-spamfilt: Chienworks* SpamFilt - 2004-02-08 23:38:04 - [59254]
X-spamfilt: IP addresses: 1
X-spamfilt: Large words found: 5
X-spamfilt: No subject
X-spamfilt: Excessive use of quoted-printable: 22.05
X-spamfilt: b-/b - 1 - click here if you
X-spamfilt: bay hits: +0 -9
X-spamfilt: bay head: +5 -8.2
X-spamfilt: bay body: +98.8 -645
X-spamfilt: bay html: + -648.1
X-spamfilt: bay index: 0.926590388368738
X-spamfilt: #0 +0 -9 =0
Return-Path: <hunnypot@compunet1.net>
Delivered-To: spamcop-net-cowtown@spamcop.net
Received: (qmail 31175 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2004 23:48:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailgate.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.101)
by blade4.cesmail.net with SMTP; 8 Feb 2004 23:48:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 23352 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2004 23:48:35 -0000
Received: from c-67-162-55-233.client.comcast.net (67.162.55.233)
by mailgate.cesmail.net with SMTP; 8 Feb 2004 23:48:33 -0000
Received: from [172.37.157.200] by c-67-162-55-233.client.comcast.net id
<2748519-29432> for <cowtown@spamcop.net>; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 01:46:51 +0300
Message-ID: <78-bo-039k1-2w7-$j3751h@7p6id0>
From: "" <hunnypot@compunet1.net>
Reply-To: "" <hunnypot@compunet1.net>
To: cowtown@spamcop.net
Subject: Quit your day job... cjdf khnc lnttk
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 04 01:46:51 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="2AAC6BBA97D3"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on blade4
X-Spam-Level: *****************
X-Spam-Status: hits.5 tests=CLICK_BELOW,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,HTML_50_60,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,
HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,
MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,
MISSING_MIMEOLE,NO_REAL_NAME,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT version=2.63
X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.101 67.162.55.233
X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked bl.spamcop.net
<font color=#ffffff size=1>order confirmation. your order should be shipped by January, via fedex.
your federal express tracking number is dirty.</font><font size="1">
<font color=#ffffff> thank you for registering. your userid is:
mayo</font></font>
<a
href="http://www.gymnast.djenis.info/index.php?id=173&affid=4924">
Cl<!--huck-->ick Here For Information</a></strong> </p>
</font>
<p></p></p>
<p><font color="#000000" size="2" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">cli<!--hying-->ck
<a href="http://djenis.info/gone.php">here</a> if you would not like toreceive future mai<!--crazy-->lings.</font></p>
</center>
</body>
</html> TOASTEDspam.com toasted spam dot com
